
Someday...
I’m about halfway done going through the tracts which have homes in escrow. This all started out with a comment by CotoAgent about prices in Orange County going up, so I wanted to see what was happening in Coto. When I started I didn’t know the answer. As I started going through a few tracts the answer became pretty obvious.
While its interesting to look tract by tract, I also want to occasionally look at the “Bigger Picture” of Coto as a whole, since that was my goal. I’m about halfway done I figured I’d compile some stats…
Tract Selection
I started in the south and moved north, as I said I would. That just made it easier for me to make sure I hit them all, as was viewing things in redfin. I only focused on tracts with a home in escrow for now. I have no idea if either of these decisions biases my data. Just thought I’d say this in case anyone thinks I’m cherry picking tracts to serve some agenda. In all honesty I started with a question and methodology, and not an answer.
One Tidbit
Here’s the most interesting “meaningless trivia” I’ve found so far… (if people have others they want to see, let me know): of the 14 tracts I’ve accumulated data on so far, in 8 of them the lowest sale since 2007 which was the most recent sale in that tract:
- Oak View
- Courante
- Valle Vista
- Tera Vida
- Southern Hills
- Glen Eagles
- Chantemar
- Meritage
Another stat I want to collect, but need some time, will be to see how the homes in escrow statistically compare to the low, median and high of 2009/10 for each tract… how many are above and below median would be interesting to me, I honestly don’t know the answer yet, I’ll grab it for my next writeup. (The only reason I picked out this above stat was in typing up the comments on each tract I kept finding myself typing this statement, so I wanted to see how many it was)
Overall Sales
| Year |
Low Sale |
High Sale |
Median |
Volume |
| Escrow |
$ 595,000.00 |
$ 1,879,000.00 |
$ 914,000.00 |
18 |
| 2010 |
$ 679,000.00 |
$ 1,230,000.00 |
$ 872,000.00 |
9 |
| 2009 |
$ 500,000.00 |
$ 1,850,000.00 |
$ 967,500.00 |
52 |
| 2008 |
$ 525,000.00 |
$ 2,276,000.00 |
$ 1,055,000.00 |
51 |
| 2007 |
$ 750,000.00 |
$ 2,200,000.00 |
$ 1,125,000.00 |
39 |
So in the above table, I really questioned if I should keep the high/low numbers. For a tract it makes sense, because it gives you an idea on product mix for a year (my idea being the low should tend to be lessor models, the high tending to be nicer models, and the median representing an average model). In the bigger picture, this captures 2 homes out of 200, so I don’t know what that really means. As it turns out, it was useful…
Unlike in my tract data, I split out 2010 and 2009. The reason I do this was to get a good comparison of 2009 vs. 2008, and to see what 2010 might look like. On a tract by tract basis these were “onsy and twosy” sales, and were not statistically significant. Over 12 tracts, its worth splitting htem out.
Looking at it, I guess the first thing which sticks out though is the low price of current 2010 sales and homes in escrow is up sharply over 2009. 2009 vs 2008 it dropped, but 2009 vs 2010 its up sharply. I’m guessing this is due to low end inventory drying out along with some price stabilization there. I’ll have to collect data later to see how homes in escrow compare with 2009 median as a function of 2009 median, to prove this.
The next thing which sticks out to me is even though the low jumped, the median dropped both in 2009 and 2010. Since the 2009 median is closed price, and the escrow price is the asking price, one could expect once these sales close, the median will drop a few percent more. If I lump 2010 closed sales and 2010 escrows together, the median is also $872k. Looking at the high price for 2010, it seems to suggest at least a decent portion of the median dropping is due to more homes in the lower ends selling.
Next, volume. In the tracts we’ve looked at so far, volume was level 2009 over 2008, and up 25% in 2008 over 2007. Volume of the homes in escrow and closed, 2 months in, is 1/2rd of the 2009 sales. So while prices on the mid to high end might not be recovering yet, volume is picking up on the lower tracts.
Comments
Overall, my original question was “what did prices in coto do in 2009″? That’s what I’m after. So far, 14 tracts in, I feel 13 of them had price decreases. The 14th its debatable due to low volume. I’d have to go back, but I guess some of the other tracts went down on low volume as well. So we could argue 13, 14, 10, whatever… I think its pretty fair to say so far with the tracts I’ve looked at, the vast majority dropped in price 2008 versus 2009. But I’ll keep going.
When I’m done with everything I’ll try to break trends down more by price range versus lumping them all together. For now, since I’m not done, I just wanted to take a quick peak myself.
That’s about it for now… I’ll leave the rest open to discussion. If there is data you want, let me know. When I’m done with this series I’ll most likely publish my spreadsheet if people want. (Its just not in a real useable state right now… as you all noticed I changed my format over a few posts, so I need to go back and make them all look similar)
C Delroy Spuckler Uncategorized